Entrez un mot ou une phrase dans n'importe quelle langue 👆
Langue:
Traduction et analyse de mots par intelligence artificielle ChatGPT
Sur cette page, vous pouvez obtenir une analyse détaillée d'un mot ou d'une phrase, réalisée à l'aide de la meilleure technologie d'intelligence artificielle à ce jour:
- comment le mot est utilisé
- fréquence d'utilisation
- il est utilisé plus souvent dans le discours oral ou écrit
- options de traduction de mots
- exemples d'utilisation (plusieurs phrases avec traduction)
- étymologie
Qu'est-ce (qui) est R v Hughes (Canada) - définition
R v Hughes (Canada)
R v Hughes (also known as the Canadian Right to Food Trial) is an ongoing court trial on the right to food in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Carter v Canada (AG)
DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
Carter v. Canada; Carter v. Canada (AG); Carter v Canada (Attorney General); Carter v Canada
Carter v Canada (AG), 2015 SCC 5 is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision where the prohibition of assisted suicide was challenged as contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter") by several parties, including the family of Kay Carter, a woman suffering from degenerative spinal stenosis, and Gloria Taylor, a woman suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ("ALS").Carter v.
R v Hughes
.svg?width=200)
R v Hughes is a 2002 Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) case in which it was held that it was unconstitutional in Saint Lucia for capital punishment to be the mandatory sentence for murder. The JCPC held that because the Constitution of Saint Lucia prohibits "inhuman or degrading punishment", following a murder conviction, a trial judge must have discretion to impose a lesser penalty than death by hanging; capital punishment may be applied only in those cases that contain aggravating factors as compared to other murder cases.
Wikipédia
R v Hughes (Canada)
R v Hughes (also known as the Canadian Right to Food Trial) is an ongoing court trial on the right to food in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
